Labor lawyer Daniel Schwartz has posted Part II of his analysis of the Shelly Sindland age and gender discrimation case againsgt Fox 61 and Tribune.
He postulates that Tribune’s bankruptcy may come up as a defense against Sindland’s complaint about a salary reduction. I will be interested to hear their response to her claim that CEO Rich Graziano went around telling other employees that he was the father of her child.
He also has some interesting remarks about Tribune’s work environment as it influences the creative process.
Loading ...
Schwartz wisely picks up on, as does The Laurel, this:
And, while unrelated to the claim of discrimination, Ms. Sindland also states that in September 2008, she complained that her employer was committing “ethical violations related to receiving payments for news stories” (Paragraph 29). In the words of another blog, “What’s up with that?”
Anyone have thoughts?
denis