I’m not at all sure what this signifies, but I can think of a lot better ways for Sam Zell to spend $1,000.
-
Recent Posts
- A Problematic Emergence From Bankruptcy?
- Job Ops ‘Dark’ And ‘Old’
- Robinson Reads Poetry Tonight
- A Grant For Particular News
- Julien In As New Courant Editor
- Courchesne Revving Up
- DeSilva’s Latest Thrilla’
- Newsroom Minus Nine
- Campbell Confirms
- A More Terrible Week Than Most
- Landed On His Feet
- Bonuses Trump Jobs
- Circulation Report
- In New Zealand, No Less
- Sports Job
Recent Comments
- A Problematic Emergence From Bankruptcy? (1)
- Deborah Leekoff: At the very least, I am saying with the deepest sarcasm, Sam Zell’s...
- Job Ops ‘Dark’ And ‘Old’ (1)
- fran silverman: Hearst Connecticut Newspapers which owns the Stamford Advocate, Greenwich Time,...
- Campbell Confirms (17)
- janet koch: Thank you for posting that. I still don’t know who Joe LoRusso is and why...
- janet koch: Am I being censored? I asked who Joe LoRusso is … and that post has never been...
- Julien In As New Courant Editor (3)
- Jimmy Carl Black: Even before I saw your line “captain of a sinking ship,” I thought...
- Denis: Good luck to Andrew and deep affection for Naedine. Being loved and respected may not...
- A Problematic Emergence From Bankruptcy? (1)
Past Posts
Pages
Polls
Loading ...
Not sure where this comment fits in, but as an attempted-Courant-online user, I’d say they’ve a hit another new low.
On the Courant’s home page, the “Search” box is now partially obscured by a click-ad. It’s extremely difficult to see enough of the box to type into it. One false move, and you’re whisked away to the “Mohegan Sun” or some other ad site.
“Searching” is one of the best advantages of using an online news site. Why in the world would the Courant mess with it – and so clumsily?
Thanks for the chance to vent . . . .