I’m not at all sure what this signifies, but I can think of a lot better ways for Sam Zell to spend $1,000.
-
Recent Posts
- Two Bits For Its Bites?
- The Poop On The Scoop.
- Page View Desperation
- Horgan And The Twain To Meet
- The Value Of Money
- Money Stinks, Nobody Thinks
- Good Money After Bad
- Settlement
- Fodors Looking For Freelancers
- Pete Tchakirides Passes
- The Journalist/Survivor Syndrome
- Plain-Talker Wanted
- Fewer Journalists, More Journalism?
- Money The First Mission, Journalism Second
- Not Drunk, Lawyer Says
Recent Comments
- Two Bits For Its Bites? (2)
- conneciticut roofer: I don’t think I would pay to read the tribune online
- conneciticut roofer: I wonder if that will destroy the rankings of the tribune if they charge for...
- The Poop On The Scoop. (3)
- Alfred Runyon: Well said, but on the other hand, I wouldn’t expect investigative...
- Paul Stern: I don’t think the daily blog is intended to be a vehicle solely for heavy-duty...
- Alfred Runyon: Investigative reporting? A “claim check” on whether Twitter is more...
- Topix — More Polish, Same Crap (30)
- Sabine Faustin: Sadly, more than two years later and nothing has changed at Topix.com; they...
- Two Bits For Its Bites? (2)
Past Posts
Pages
Polls
Loading ...
Not sure where this comment fits in, but as an attempted-Courant-online user, I’d say they’ve a hit another new low.
On the Courant’s home page, the “Search” box is now partially obscured by a click-ad. It’s extremely difficult to see enough of the box to type into it. One false move, and you’re whisked away to the “Mohegan Sun” or some other ad site.
“Searching” is one of the best advantages of using an online news site. Why in the world would the Courant mess with it – and so clumsily?
Thanks for the chance to vent . . . .